United Kingdom›Youth & County Lines
Sources & methods↗
Safeguarding and policing intelligence

Youth & county lines

Population prevalence, specialist-treatment demand, exploitation risk and the latest national programme results in one operational view.

Any drug use15.1%Age 16–24 · CSEW
In treatment16,212+13% year on year
Cannabis86%Of young people in treatment
Ketamine9%1,465 young people
01

County Lines Programme results

Latest cumulative management information from funded law-enforcement activity

Line closures4,556July 2024–March 2026
Arrests12,697Programme-funded activity
Safeguarding referrals6,939At least · programme activity
Knives seized1,900Knives / sharp objects
2,821line holders charged
882children and young people supported by the specialist service

The NCA assesses that the number of county lines was broadly stable between 2024 and 2025, while distribution became more localised and social-media lines increased significantly. There is no current official national total for every active line. Closures measure programme activity and should not be presented as the size of the whole market.

Open Home Office data ↗
Treatment profile

Substances recorded

01Cannabis86%
02Alcohol46%
03Ketamine9%
04Solvents6%
▦ OHID◷ 2024–25Open source ↗
Market adaptation

What police and commissioners should watch

More localised supply

Cross-boundary lines remain relevant, but local distribution can reduce the visibility of travel-based indicators.

Social-media lines

Recruitment, advertising and order-taking are moving further into online and encrypted spaces.

Closure is not recovery

Track repeat exploitation, service engagement and safety after enforcement, not line closure alone.

▦ NCA National Strategic Assessment◷ 2026Open source ↗
Operational intersections

Safeguarding priorities

01

Exploitation and debtCoercion and threats may present as offending rather than safeguarding need.

02

School exclusionReduced protective structure can increase exposure to market activity.

03

Violence and cuckooingWeapons, robbery and home takeover require coordinated assessment.

04

Hidden treatment needYoung people may not approach specialist services without assertive pathways.

Local intelligence specification

Minimum commissioner and police dataset

Demand

Known lines, social-media handles, drug types, deal formats and changes in geography.

Exploitation

Age, missing episodes, school exclusion, debt, threats, transport routes and repeat referrals.

Harm

Weapons, violence, sexual exploitation, cuckooing, overdose and mental-health presentations.

Response

Closures, charges, safeguarding outcomes, treatment access, return to exploitation and service retention.

Equity

Sex, ethnicity, neurodiversity, care experience, housing status and rural access where lawful and proportionate.

How to read programme figures

The Home Office figures are quality-assured management information supplied by forces and the National County Lines Coordination Centre, but they may be revised. One line holder can control several lines, and a closure does not necessarily mean exploitation or supply has ended.

Method and definitions ↗
UK Drug Trends Intelligence

TD Consultancy · Latest available data, provisional statistics, experimental estimates and operational intelligence are labelled separately · Verify decisions against the linked primary evidence.